In Case You’re
Asked…Who Disciples Covenant Children?
From time to time
we need to be reminded that much of our understanding Scripture is
obviously culturally conditioned. We often fail to see what God is
communicating in his word. This impacts us at the application
level. As I study hermeneutics (Bible interpretation), I realize
how easy it is to make the wrong application of what we think God
intended to say and miss the point.
We can take a
word in the original Hebrew language in the Old Testament or Greek
in the New Testament and translate it into our language, which we
believe we should do according to the first chapter of
Westminster Confession of Faith. Sometimes the word chosen to
translate may not clearly represent the original idea. That is why
we should check several good translations when studying the
Scriptures. It is even better to know how to use the original
words.
This is
particularly applicable with the English word “family.” The
Oxford American Dictionary’s first definition is “parents
and children.” On the other hand The Webster New Collegiate
Dictionary begins “a group of people united by certain
convictions (as of religion or philosophy).” Further down the
list is the idea of parents and children.
In Genesis 12,
God establishes his promise to Abraham’s family. “…In you
all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” Most
translations use “family” to translate the Hebrew word mishpachah.
However, that is more than a reference to the family as mom and
pop and the children. The term refers to something broader and
more inclusive than what we call the nuclear family. To understand
what the Scriptures are saying, we must not only have some
familiarity with the original setting but we must also read those
words in the context in which the Bible writer uses them.
When God
established his covenant with Abraham and his family, his intent
was something beyond what we usually think of as family, i.e. the
smaller family unit. He was referring to tribes, peoples, a clan
or a circle of relations. The closet Hebrew word used to connote
father, mother, and children is bayet, which is, translated
“household.” Dr. Allan Curry, professor at Reformed
Theological Seminary in Jackson, Ms. and a regional trainer for
Christian Education and Publications has pointed out that there is
simply no good Hebrew word for family as we use it today. The
closest translation is “tribes.” He is on target with that
statement.
What does all of
this have to do with this “In Case You’re Asked” page? The
lead article focuses on youth ministry in a local church. We are
sometimes asked, “why should the church be involved in a
children and youth ministry? That is the family’s responsibility
to train, disciple, and educate them.” Whose responsibility is
it to train, disciple, and educate God’s covenant children? Here
is how we normally reply to that type of question.
First, understand
that when the Scriptures use the word “family” in their
English translation, they are not simply referring to parents and
children. In the biblical family order, we could actually think of
family using concentric circles. Parents and children are the
inner circle, relatives are the next circle, and the third larger
circle are those joined together by religion or philosophy, to use
Webster’s definition. For us that is the church. The usual
English definition suggests the first circle and maybe the second
but seldom the third broader circle.
Second, there are
Scriptures that relate to parents and children. But the Scriptures
also speak of the covenant family of God, which we call the
church. It implies the broader sense of peoples, tribes or clans.
Third, both
parents and church must understand that in discipling God’s
covenant children and educating them in the whole counsel of God,
they are partners in that process. When the sixth chapter of
Deuteronomy refers to that process, the instructions are not
simply addressed to parents but to the whole of “Israel” (the
church) as well.
The Presbyterian
Church in America has attempted to understand and apply the family
in the Hebrew Christian sense. For example, in describing its form
of government, we read, “ The members of the visible Church
catholic area all those persons in every nation, together with
their children, who make profession of their faith in the Lord
Jesus Christ and promise submission to His laws,” (BOCO 1:3).
In BOCO 4:1 “A particular church consists of a number of
professing Christians, with their children, associated together
for divine worship and godly living, agreeable to Scriptures, and
submitting to the lawful government of Christ’s kingdom.”
In BOCO 6:1
“The children of believers are, through the covenant and by
right of birth, noncommuning members of the church. Hence they are
entitled to Baptism, and to pastoral oversight, instruction, and
government of the church, with a view to their embracing Christ
and thus possessing personally all benefits of the covenant.”
Another passage from BOCO relates to the question asked at
the time of covenant baptism of a child. After several questions
are asked of the parents, the congregation is then asked, “Do
you as a congregation undertake the responsibility of assisting
the parents in the Christian nurture of this child?” We believe
the church and parents have a mutual, partnering role in the
responsibilities of discipling covenant children. Neither the
smaller family nor the larger covenant families are instructed to
do that alone.
Fourth, our BOCO
57-5 states, “ Of the number of those who were baptized in
infancy as members of the Church of God by birthright, and as
heirs of the covenant promises, the Session has examined and
approved (call them by name), who come now to assume for
themselves the full privileges and responsibilities of their
inheritance in the household of faith.” In applying that to
specific situations, we have practiced and recommended on many
occasions the following procedures. While the decision to admit
covenant children to the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper (become
communing members) belongs to the Session, where applicable
parents and the Session should concur that this covenant child
believes the Gospel and has a certain understanding along with
genuine fruit of a “credible profession.”
Both parents and
church are responsible to take seriously the covenant promises of
God. This means to nurture and disciple the children with great
care, with all the beliefs and hopes that they are among the
children of God. During that early process, they are not to be
viewed as being outside the church but as having certain rights,
privileges, and expectations, such as spelled out in the PCA
BOCO.
The church must
have an active children and youth ministry. John Calvin suggests
that Christian education or the discipling process begins with
one’s baptism, which marks the public identification of a
child’s belonging to God’s covenant family. They must be
taught what that means. Both parents and church have the mutual
responsibility to nurture and disciple those precious children and
youth, as befits their covenant relation.
In case you’re
asked, the church has a crucial role in discipling covenant
children, as well as parents. Partnering is a great covenant
concept of applying God’s promises. I discovered a magnificent
book several months ago. Lewis Schenck, who served as professor at
Davidson College for nearly forty years, wrote The Presbyterian
Doctrine of Children in the Covenant. I’ll discuss this book
in a future issue of Equip for Ministry. For now I read it
as a challenge to take God’s covenant promises more seriously
where his children are concerned. This will be one of the six
books that I would use and recommend for any Christian education
course.
Dean Conkel’s
lead article “Five Diamonds of Youth Ministry” is timely and
extremely appropriate. Local churches, working with the parents
where possible, need to evaluate, examine, and draw some strategic
conclusions on how to disciple their covenant children. If you are
asked if the church is to train and educate the covenant children,
the answer is “they must.”
Charles
Dunahoo
Back
to Equip Page
|