Here is a book
that anyone attempting to understand the world, especially the
world of ideas, should have at or near the top their list of
reference books. I want to choose my words carefully in describing
this book. It is a map. It is an in-depth reference book of
history and ideas within the Christian framework. It is a book
about philosophy leading up to but focusing mainly on
postmodernism. It is a book full of helpful and valuable insights
in the development of theological and philosophical thought. While
those words may suggest that this book is merely academic, for
professional scholars, or trained clergy (and it is all those
things) it is also a very readable book for the broader Christian
community.
In many ways it
reminds me of Stanley Grenz’s Primer on Postmodernism,
only more expansive. There are so many conflicting opinions
regarding postmodernism. On one extreme, some people denounce all
that is connected with that philosophy. On the opposite extreme,
others accept all that is understandable about postmodernism.
Greer helps us to realize that there is much to be learned from
postmodernism, especially as it relates to communicating the
gospel and truth to this generation.
We need to be
aware of Greer’s thought-provoking ideas regarding absolute
truth and in order to communicate clearly to today’s audience. I
believe he writes with sensitivity to our orthodox position but
places his ideas in a context that speaks to contemporary people.
He distinguishes between biblical truth and foundations in
contrast to the philosophical foundationalism of 17th
and 18th century philosophers and theologians. They
grounded much of their thought on Scottish realism versus biblical
revelation. You will remember Descartes’ famous saying, “I
think therefore I am” as he dealt with certainty, doubt, and
foundation. That tends to get a negative reaction from many
postmodernists. Yet, biblical revelation is often included because
of the belief that the two positions are part of the same, which
of course is not the case.
Greer gives a
good contrast between St. Augustine’s belief that there is
perfect knowledge and Descartes’ similar belief. The way in
which perfect knowledge becomes possible differs greatly between
the two. Sadly, Descartes’ approach is often confused with or
included in Augustine’s more biblical approach.
Others and I have
used a three-part timeline to delineate the development of
philosophical and theological thought over the years: premodern,
modern, and postmodern. Greer suggests a five-part timeline:
premodern, modern, existentialism, postmodern, and post
postmodern. The former model used existentialism as a bridge
between the modern and postmodern periods, and included Greer’s
post postmodern within postmodernism, namely the emphasis on
community and relationships. Greer has a lengthy appendix in which
he defines and describes these five areas, which I found helpful.
Greer also
suggests, as we have done, that postmodernism may either be just
that or it may be ultra-modernism in its final form. A thought
worth thinking about! Greer reminds us that Jesus Christ cannot be
understood in the abstract but only in the personal area of faith
and knowledge. He is the personal God who cannot be known
impersonally. Failure in making that distinction leads many
postmoderns to deal with them as one, thus missing an important
part of the whole picture. Greer says, “ in the
post-postmodernism” paradigm, absolute truth has a name: Jesus
Christ. As the Creator of the heavens and the earth, Jesus Christ
is the personification of truth par excellence, the one who is to
be loved and known, but never mastered.”
This book,
carefully read, studied, and discussed, could be one of those
landmark books that helps us navigate through the turbulent waters
of the early 21st century with a better understanding
of how to communicate God’s truth to today’s generation.
-Charles Dunahoo
Back
to Equip Page
|