In the Nov/Dec 2004 Equip for
Ministry, we reviewed a strategic book on biotechnology, Human
Dignity in the BioTech Century, edited by Charles W. Colson and
Nigel M. de S. Cameron. We believe biotechnology is one of the
most crucial, exciting, challenging, yet dangerous areas for us to
consider. Without a doubt it is true that the 21st century will
prove to be the biotech century. Therefore, Christians need to be
prepared to think clearly from a biblical reformed worldview and
know how to teach their children to do the same. We are
responsible to serve God in all of life, including biotechnology,
but with our sinful nature we cannot always be trusted to do so
because of our tendency to play God.
When it comes to biotechnology, we
must not fall into the trap of dualism. Dualism is one of the most
dangerously deceptive ideas today for Christians and
non-Christians as well. So much of our Western thinking is based
on it. Dualism has even taken deep roots within the evangelical
community. Dualism seeks to divide life in to separate units or
areas that do not need to connect. The result, as far as
biotechnology is concerned, is the conscious effort to separate
technology from ethics. This is dangerous because of its
implications on the Lordship of Christ.
In reality you cannot separate
ethics and technology. There are no dualistic sacred and secular
realms in life. All of life is one. God has structured his reality
to underscore the "unity of reality." The danger of
dualism is the temptation to believe that it is permissible for
man to do whatever he is capable of doing. In other words, the
ability to do something means that it is allowable to do. But, is
that a proper line of reasoning, especially with the fine line
between serving God and playing God?
In the case of artificial or
alternative reproduction, scientists have been able to manipulate
and control the birth process. Creating embryos in vitro (in the
petri dish) is being done over and over. It is now a technological
reality that life can be created artificially. Man can do that
with a fairly good track record. But, should it be done? After all
many childless couples now have children by the in vitro
fertilization process. That process, however, raises ethical
dilemmas. Scientists and medical personnel may need to create from
three to five embryos for one to work, but what happens with the
leftovers? What are we now to do with the between 300,000 to one
million frozen embryos in storage? The shelf lives of many of
those embryos are reaching their expiration dates.
I participated in a think tank a
few years ago with a group made up of ethicists, lawyers,
psychologists, and doctors dealing with this very dilemma. That
was a challenging, as well as enlightening, experience. I will use
the term artificial or alternative reproduction as an example to
respond to several questions recently asked us, regarding the
PCA's position on stem cell research.
In case you're asked, I respond in
a twofold manner. First, the PCA has not, as of yet, adopted a
position on stem cell research. However, the PCA has adopted
positions on the sanctity of human life, which become a guide for
us in this area. For example: In its position statement on
abortion, the PCA has said clearly that human life begins at
conception and as such, "is under the protection of the Sixth
Commandment …and that because Scripture clearly affirms the
sanctity of life and condemns its arbitrary destruction, we affirm
that the intentional killing of an unborn child between concept
and birth, for any reason, is clearly a violation of the Sixth
Commandment, (1980 General Assembly Minutes, Overture 12).
When it comes to stem cell
research, we have to operate ethically and morally. Therefore we
ask if stem cell research is ethically and morally permissible.
Our immediate response is that as long as it does not violate the
Sixth Commandment, maybe so. However, we are told that the easiest
way "to produce stem cells is to divide an early stage embryo
into its component cells, thereby destroyed the embryonic human
being." (The Reproductive Revolution, John F. Kilner, Paige
C. Cunningham, and W. David Hagar). While it may or may not be
true that stem cells have the capacity to develop body parts,
tissues, and organs, this does not justify the violation of the
Sixth Commandment regarding "embryonic humans" in order
to get those things. We believe that such stem cell research with
human embryos crosses the line ethically and biblically, and
Christians must know how to speak out in this area. We cannot fall
into the dualistic trap at this critical point.
Stem cell research with adults, on
the other hand, is not a life-threatening proposition and can
possibly do much good in things like "genetic repair."
So it may be permissible in some cases. Where there is no
violation of the Sixth Commandment, such research is permissible,
as long as scientist realizes that life is sacred and they are
self-consciously operating on that biblical commandment.
In conclusion to the question,
"what is the PCA's position on stem cell research?" we
will simply say, as long as we adhere to the sanctity of life and
do not transgress the Sixth Commandment, and as long as we do not
attempt to separate bioethics from biotechnology, we believe man
has and can continue to serve God's purpose in a positive and life
honoring way. However, we must start from a solidly biblical and
ethical foundation as the research continues. As long we are
engaged in making kingdom disciples, we will do what we can to
encourage parents, adults, and churches in their discipleship and
education training to teach God's covenant people how to deal with
these extremely important issues.
Back
to Equip
|