The Kyzer family reunion was an impressive
experience for me as an eight-year-old child. My mother’s side of
the family, the German side, had gathered at a park in Tuscaloosa,
Alabama for a picnic and reminiscences. I knew I had a lot of
cousins, sixteen to be exact; but at that gathering I began to
realize my family was much larger than I had previously thought,
with four generations of people who looked, thought, and behaved
like each other to varying degrees. Then, when there was talk of
ancestors long dead, I knew I came from an even larger family with
deep roots.
The Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) is the
second largest Presbyterian denomination in the USA and relatively
young as far as denominations go, begun in 1973. Overall,
Presbyterians are a small minority of Christians in America. We
need to realize, however, that we are part of something bigger
than we usually think.
Our church family has deep roots, not only back to
the Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century, but back to
the early church and even into the Old Testament era as well. It
is our understanding from Scripture that the church is composed of
all the people whom God has chosen to call unto Himself. Our
Westminster Confession of Faith puts it this way, “The catholic or
universal Church, which is invisible, consists of the whole number
of the elect, that have been, are, or shall be gathered into one,
under Christ the Head thereof; and is the spouse, the body the
fullness of Him that filleth all in all.”1 The church then is not
just New Testament believers only, but all who are saved by
Christ, both before and after Christ’s incarnation and
redemption.2 Key biblical texts on this issue are Romans 4 and
Galatians 3 where the Scriptures teach that all believers (both
Old and New Testaments) are justified by faith alone in God’s
Anointed Redeemer and that all who trust in Christ are spiritual
descendants of Abraham. This deep-roots understanding of the
church has several significant implications. It is why we prefer
to speak of a “biblical church,” spanning and based upon both Old
and New Testament, scriptures rather than a “New Testament
church,” not beginning until the New Testament and based on New
Testament scriptures only. This means that the whole Bible, not
just the New Testament, is for us. Covenant Theology may simply,
perhaps simplistically, be expressed by the statement, “In the Old
Testament, God was faithful to his people as families, not just as
individuals; in the New Testament God is still faithful to his
people as families, not just as individuals.” That is why we
practice covenant baptism of our children. Moreover, we see
continuity between the Passover of the Old Testament and the
Lord’s Supper in the New Testament. So, the rites of our family
have deep roots.
We call ourselves “Presbyterians” because we have
a representative and connectional form of church government in a
church governed by elders (presbuteroi). Collegial leadership by a
plurality of elders began in the days of Moses (Numbers 11), was
enhanced in the synagogue movement beginning in the sixth century
BC, continued in the New Testament (Acts 14:23) as the apostolic
practice, continued until the mid-second century AD, and was
restored by John Calvin and John Knox in the Reformation of the
sixteenth century.3 So the system by which our family is managed
has deep roots both biblically and historically.
Just as there are strong physical resemblances in
extended families, there are certain beliefs held by all branches
of the Christian family. These common beliefs are expressed in
such ancient creeds as the Apostles Creed and the Nicene Creed.
When we confess our faith in common worship by affirming these
creeds in congregational unison, we are confessing the beliefs of
the extended family for millennia.
All families have illustrious members and black
sheep, members of whom we are rather proud and others we would
prefer not to discuss. The visible church has always been a
mixture of true and false professors, truth and error. Our family
did not begin in the sixteenth century Reformation. Our deep-roots
view of the church means that all of the history of the church is
our family’s story. We may proudly claim church fathers such as
Justin Martyr, Polycarp, Tertullian, Augustine of Hippo,
Athanasius, and others as “our folks.” Since the church has never
been pristinely pure, as evinced by the errors and divisions Paul
often addressed in his epistles, our family has had some heretics
and rogues in our ranks over the millennia, which we sadly
acknowledge. The church has to struggle in every generation to
maintain purity of doctrine and holiness of living.
Not only does our family have deep roots, our
family also has several separate branches. Though for a thousand
years there were smaller and more short-lived divisions in the
church, there was not a formal division until the Great Schism of
A.D.1054 between the eastern and western churches. The eastern
churches developed into the Eastern Orthodox Churches and the
western churches developed into the Roman Catholic Church. Our
spiritual predecessors were part of the western branch.
As the doctrinal aberrations and moral laxity
increased over the years in the Western church, the Protestant
Reformation came as a “tragic necessity” in the Roman Catholic
Church in the sixteenth century. Coming out of the Reformation
several family clans developed, Lutherans, Reformed, Anglican,4
and Anabaptist. Our branch of the family is the Reformed branch
influenced by such leaders as Ulrich Zwingli, John Calvin, John
Knox, and Francis Turretin. Reformed folks affirm that God is
actively sovereign, sin has adversely affected the entire human
personality, the Bible is the supreme rule of what we believe and
how we are to live, and God is gracious to His people as families
from one generation to another, not simply to individuals. We are
part of Evangelicalism (high view of Scripture, emphasis on
individual conversion, evangelism, missions, etc.) that arose due
to the Great Awakening of the eighteenth century and the Second
Great Awakening in the nineteenth century, the conservative side
of the fundamentalist-modernist controversy between World War I
and World War II, and the evangelical post World War II movement.
There have been disagreements and reconciliations
that have occurred within our family over the years that resulted
in several denominational-level divisions and reunions. In 1741,
there was a division, the Old Side/ New Side controversy over the
First Great Awakening; but a reunion took place in 1758. In 1837,
there was a division over doctrinal subscription, the Old School,
taking the firmer position. In 1861, the Presbyterian Church in
the Confederate States was formed when the Old School General
Assembly required allegiance to the Federal Government of the
United States. In 1865, the name of the Southern Church was
changed to the Presbyterian Church in the United States; and the
Synods of Kentucky and Missouri joined. The Southern Church was
not as quickly affected by theological decline, laxity in
discipline, and a trend toward a more hierarchal type of
Presbyterian polity as was the Northern Church; but eventually,
such unhealthy beliefs and practices took root. After several
decades of ineffective efforts to counteract those trends, the
PCUS conservatives faced a crossroads in the early 1970s. Some
conservatives decided to remain in the PCUS to bear witness to
evangelical truth. Others concluded that time, effort, and
resources could be better channeled into positive efforts by
forming a new denomination. The PCA founders “in much prayer and
with great sorrow and mourning . . . concluded that to practice
the principle of the purity of the Church” they “reluctantly
accepted the necessity of separation” and severed their ties with
their Mother Church “with deepest regret and sorrow.”5 The PCA
could be rightly described as “reluctant and grieving
separatists.”
Our convictions to preserve the purity of the
church led us to separate ourselves from what we believed to be an
irreparable situation from the human perspective. On the other
hand, our theological convictions of the connectional nature of
the church and Christ’s desire for visible unity compel us to seek
union with other churches of the same doctrinal convictions and
representative form of church government. Therefore, the PCA was
involved in the formation of the North American Presbyterian and
Reformed Council in 1975. For a time there was an effort to effect
a four-way merger of the PCA, the Christian Reformed Church, the
Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America, and the Reformed
Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Synod. The four-way merger did
not come about, but there was a “Joining and Receiving” that took
place in 1982 when the RPCES was received as a body into the PCA.
The merger added churches in the Northeast, Midwest, and West to
make the PCA a national denomination and added Canadian churches
as well to make the PCA an international denomination. Meanwhile,
with vigorous church planting efforts, the PCA continued to grow.
Just as some families have common recognizable
physical characteristics and patterns of behavior, the PCA has its
distinctives as well. Our brand of Presbyterianism has been called non-hierarchal
Presbyterianism, democratic Presbyterianism, or grassroots
Presbyterianism. Our connectionalism is spiritual. Our churches,
presbyteries, and General Assembly are separate civil entities
that voluntarily bind us together. We are bound together by three
mutual commitments of Presbyterian connectionalism: Doctrinal
Fidelity through a binding theological standard (Westminster
Standards), Accountability through connectional church courts and
discipline, and Cooperative Ministry (we should minister together
and can accomplish more together than independently).
We seek to relate to other Presbyterian and
Reformed churches, as well as to other Christians through various
means. We are part of the North American Presbyterian and Reformed
Council composed of Evangelical Presbyterian and Reformed
denominations in North America who hold to the Westminster
Standards or the Three Forms of Unity. Early on, the PCA became
part of the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) composed of
evangelical denominations, local churches, institutions,
individuals, and ministries who subscribe to the NAE Evangelical
Doctrinal Statement, representing the evangelical community in the
USA. Through its participation in the NAE, the PCA has contacts
with other evangelical Christian denominations, organizations,
individuals, and ministries; shares in the mercy ministries of the
World Relief Commission; participates in world evangelization; and
has a greater voice and influence in civic engagement through the
NAE Office of Governmental Affairs in Washington D.C. We are part
of the World Reformed Fellowship (WRF) composed of evangelical
denominations, local churches, institutions, individuals, and
ministries who subscribe to the WRF doctrinal standards, forming a
fellowship as a resourcing community for ministry worldwide.
Moreover, many PCA local churches, individual members, officers,
and ministers partner with other Christians in their own
communities for evangelistic and mercy ministries through word and
deed.
The Lord has richly blessed the PCA in its brief
history with notable growth and an influence far beyond our
relatively small size in comparison to the largest Protestant
denominations in North America. We now have 76 Presbyteries,
±340,000 members, ±1,600 churches, ±100 campus ministries, and
±600 career missionaries. As far as denominations go, we have
grown significantly. And so we remember our Lord’s words, “unto
who much is given, much is required.”
As Christians we are part of the church universal
that transcends denomination, class, culture, economic status,
political persuasion, ethnic origin, gender, or any other
distinction that separates people. We are part of the “One, Holy,
Catholic, and Apostolic Church” as we confess in the Nicene Creed.
The church universal is the Body of Christ composed of all
Christians. Christ promised that the church will eventually be
triumphant, that the very gates of hell will give way to the
gospel-bearing church (Matthew 16:18). That promise is to the
church as a whole, not to any one single branch of it.
Each time we receive communion we are reminded of
the present, broad extent of the Christian family, the church
universal, the “one loaf,” “we who are many are one body” (I
Corinthians 10:17); and we look forward with keen anticipation to
the ultimate family reunion, the lavish banquet prophesied by
Isaiah (Isaiah 25:6-12), the great feast promised by our Lord
Jesus Christ (Luke 13:29; 14:15; 22:16), the marriage supper of
the Lamb envisioned by John (Revelation 19:7-10) to be celebrated
when Christ returns. Think of it! As a Christian you are part of a
huge family, not just a few hundred thousand, but billions of
Christ’s people; not just part of some relatively recently
established family, but one with a spiritual ancestry that goes
all the way back to Adam and Eve; not some family that has little
or no influence, but one that will successfully assault the gates
of hell. May God give us grace to live and serve in accordance
with the family name. . . Christian.

1 Westminster Confession of Faith (WCF 25-1; see
Eph. 1:10, 22-23; 5:23, 27, 32).
2 Presbyterian-Reformed Christians believe that
the Church includes believers of both the Old and New Testaments
for several reasons: (1) Believers of both the Old and New
Testaments have the same Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; (2)
Believers of the both the Old and New Testaments have the same
destiny – heaven; (3) Believers of the both the Old and New
Testaments are saved on the same basis – the grace of God, and (4)
Believers of the both the Old and New Testaments receive eternal
life by the same instrumentality – faith. See also WCF 7-5 on the
administration Of God’s Covenant with Man in the Old Testament and
New Testament being one covenant of grace differently
administered. For a fuller discussion of the continuity of the
Church from Old Testament into the New Testament see my comments
in Who Runs the Church: Four Views on Church Government. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 2004. Steven B Cowan, editor.
3 For a well-documented essay on the assertion
that the early church until mid-second century was led by elders
see J. B. Lightfoot, St. Paul’s Epistle to the Philippians. (Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 1953), 181-269. Lightfoot, a New Testament and
Patristics scholar at Cambridge University, later became Bishop of
Durham in the Church of England. For an explanation of the
historical factors that led to the development of Episcopal church
government see my comments in Who Runs the Church: Four Views on
Church, 86-90.
4 Some Anglicans consider themselves “Reformed
Catholics,” others regard themselves a definitely Protestant with
Lutheran or Reformed theological positions.
5 This is evinced in the “Message to All Churches”
adopted by the First General Assembly (see Minutes of the 1st
General Assembly, 1973, pp.40-42).