In order to understand how to teach, learn, or
even preach effectively, we must understand how people process
information. This is the subject of learning styles. Most teaching
and preaching are done according to one’s own learning style. By
doing this we miss reaching those who do not learn the same way we
do. Did you ever wonder why you were drawn by certain teachers and
preachers and not others? It was because they communicated by the
same learning style you have.
There are four basic elements to learning that
need to be understood. The first two elements deal with
perception; the way we take in new information. This is done in
either a concrete or abstract way. Concrete learners
perceive things by what their senses take in; and if they are
heavily concrete, they see little more than what their senses take
in. The opposite is true for the abstract learner. This type of
learner takes in new information and conceives new ideas from the
concrete. For example, I have two sons. The first sees only what
is in front of him; he does not understand jokes or puns. When he
drives, he sees the sign that says the speed limit is 35; and he
will drive 35 mph, no more, no less. The other son sees the same
sign and perceives this to mean 35 is the suggested limit. He has
the tickets to prove it.
The next part of the process shows how we order
new information. Do we put things in sequential order or
random order? Most of us know that when we study history we do
so from beginning to the present, and we work accordingly. We also
know that what happens in history depends on what went before.
This is how the sequential learner lines things up. The random
learner sees not the sequence as important but the event itself.
To this learner, the order is not important, just the event – in
any order.
The individual elements are the easiest to
understand. Now we put these together and get their combinations.
If you get a learner who is abstract random, sometimes
called an Imaginative Learner, you get someone who is prone
to be very people-oriented, idealistic, learns by talking things
through (teachers love that!), dislikes lectures and working
alone, and works better in a colorful environment.
The concrete sequential (analytics) is a
detailed person who loves facts. (Just give me a new dictionary
and I’m happy.) It doesn’t mean they want to do anything with the
facts; they just love to collect them, such as Cliff Claven from
Cheers. These are the great debaters who will use these
facts to prove you wrong. This is the ONLY category that learns
well by lecture! (Preachers take note.) They also love competition
and working alone.
Abstract sequentials are common sense
people who like to take the facts gathered by the analytics and
figure out what they can do with them to put things to work in
some useful way. These too do not learn much from lectures. They
are goal-oriented, well structured, resent being given answers,
and excel in problem solving.
The last category is concrete random. These
are the dynamic people who teachers “hate” the most because they
want to run the classroom, think outside the box, and are
innovators who use a lot of instinct. They demand flexibility. If
you give them an assignment, they will ask if there is a way to do
it other than the one you required. They might get the assignment
done on time but don’t expect it. These people are natural born
leaders and great visionaries, but they are not detailed people.
In Part 3, we will begin to develop each of these
four learning styles and put together ways to help them learn.